Foldyourarmsandsaynah wrote:

Gramsci wrote:
C: Tom thinks - He has really refused to deny this as reality- that the world is controlled by demon/angel/human hybrids.

I wanna hear more about this, because I didn't enjoy the movie Constantine and I need a substitute.

I'm not obsessive like Tom (Rick's actual name) so I'm not going to search it out. It's there somewhere. Evidently Tom asserts that there is a real possibility that the banking system/world is controlled by some kind of angel/demon-human - almost always Jewish - hybrid, (think, an evil Pirus)

Tom is also 99% sure that holograms weren't used to simulate the attacks of the World Trade Center building in New York.

We came for the Shellac gossip and mic placement advice and stayed for the loon in the corner ranting at anyone that shows a passing interest.

Slint

He also advocates capital punishment for those whose faulty genetics makes them act in "elitist" ways.

Gramsci wrote:We came for the Shellac gossip and mic placement advice and stayed for the loon in the corner ranting at anyone that shows a passing interest.

The big problem is that Gramsci knows even less about Slint, Shellac and mic placement than he knows about 9/11.

gramsci wrote:I'm not obsessive like Tom (Rick's actual name) so I'm not going to search it out. It's there somewhere.

Sure it is, you drunken trustfunded cretin. If you could find these quotes you've dreamed up, they would be in your posts.

I always find what I'm looking for in the archive:

Gramsci wrote:Ummm. The WTC collapsed because the structural strength was in the external cladding of the buildings, like any cylinder. For a very easy example of how this works stand on a soda/beer can, then poke it in the side with your finger. That's the exact reason the WTC collapsed, but planes were the finger.

If that one bag did not make the connection but every other transfer from the same flight did I can with 99.9% certainty tell you it was done on purpose and this whole thing is thrown into question.
It just does not happen like that. I know it seems minor but it's not, that does not happen.

Marsupialized wrote:If that one bag did not make the connection but every other transfer from the same flight did I can with 99.9% certainty tell you it was done on purpose

Probably 'done on purpose' just like this photo with the very odd shadow pattern that Lee Harvey Oswald had taken, just to make sure that a photo existed of him holding a rifle that would supposedly fire three miraculous shots at JFK, including one shot with a Magic Bullet??

Man, Photoshop sucked in 1963. That head looks like it was cut out of a baseball card. It's smaller than the neck.

clocker bob wrote:

Marsupialized wrote:If that one bag did not make the connection but every other transfer from the same flight did I can with 99.9% certainty tell you it was done on purpose

Probably 'done on purpose' just like this photo with the very odd shadow pattern that Lee Harvey Oswald had taken, just to make sure that a photo existed of him holding a rifle that would supposedly fire three miraculous shots at JFK, including one shot with a Magic Bullet??

Man, Photoshop sucked in 1963. That head looks like it was cut out of a baseball card. It's smaller than the neck.

Which proves Tom is right about 9-11

What a dick.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technol ... 27842.html

Rick Reuben wrote:But as we all know, if Gramsci had problems with the official version, he'd lie and say he didn't. Even rats know to flee sinking ships, but not Gramsci.

There are clearly problems with your official version Tom, unfortunately for you none of them are the ones you want to be true.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technol ... 27842.html

http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

Rick Reuben wrote:

Gramsci wrote:There are clearly problems with your official version Tom

Don't call it my official version, douche. You're the murder enthusiast who's using that bucket of lies as a license for his revenge fantasies against Muslims.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technol ... 27842.html

http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

Actually Tom I was wrong about the reasons for the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings that you continually quote.

To be blunt when I made those comments I hadn't really looked at the evidence and wasn't really interested in the topic anyway. They were pretty much off the cuff. But after your paranoid rants here I went and looked at the evidence.

So Tom, quote my rash assumptions in some weird diversionary tactic, but if I were you I would stop using me as a source because I was wrong.

But let me point you in the direction of the links below. If you read them you'll see why I was wrong.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technol ... 27842.html

http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

So for the record - I'll save this page so I can point you in the direction of this post, should you decide to keep dragging my error up.

Rick Reuben wrote:Second trailer for 9/11: Fabled Enemies is up on youtube:

second trailer for fabled enemies

( Warning: Like the first trailer, this trailer contains the 'I' word. A lot. )

At least they spelled September properly in this one.