steve wrote:I could (okay I will!) make the case that ignoring their position as "black men" is to reduce their music to a sound without meaning. Okay, this sound -- this collection of other people's records and sound effects meant to induce dread like the T-Rex footfalls in Jurassic Park -- is uneffective as a sound. It sounds like your average party record with a siren.
having listened to 'high period' PE (_nation of millions_ and _black planet_) a lot, i can say that i honestly think that racial politics are about as important to that portion of PE's music as the state of mid-70s britain was to the sex pistols.
the context is of note sociologically, to someone, in that the sociopolitical 'scene' in question informed almost everything either one of those bands ever did. but musically, the circumstances under which the music was made are, if not irrelevant, certainly not crucial to its success as music.
I can no more divorce hip hop music from its audience (much less its "keep it real" self-satisfaction, general tone of self-absorbed materialism, comic-book political grasp and other nonsense) than I can divorce Christian music from its audience. That is, to like this music in spite of its cultural milieu requires exceptional music, exceptional ideas and a presentation that exceeds the obvious traps of genre.
i find it real easy to divorce public enemy from all of the above, much i find it easy to divorce the sex pistols from their scattershot hatred, general tone of self-absorbed nihilism, comic-book political grasp and other nonsense.
i prefer the sex pistols to public enemy, as i prefer punk rock to hiphop. but i think the evidence (certainly _nation of millions_ and _black planet_) suggests very strongly that public enemy and the bomb squad were innovators on the level of the first punk bands.
if you don't hear that, then sure, i think everything you say is internally consistent
I think all genre music suffers from this, to greater and lesser degees, but hip hop is particularly victim of it because it is so formally simple and so hide-bound by a small number of very specific stylistic expectations (which extend beyond the music into the subject matter, "personality" and even word count).
Someone will surely mount a defense of the sort that equates hip hop music to country music or other genre musics, and I grant equivocation on some points. But rapping is by far more limited by its genre (partly oweing to short developmental history, but mostly by what defines it) than these other genres, with the possible exception of surf music.
i love much country music, but you don't get more formally simple and hidebound than that
anyway, i'm not going to make a case for hiphop as a genre. i don't think it needs my help, and i'm not well-versed enough in it to handle the job.
but to call public enemy in particular 'formally simple'....those lyrical structures, those beats, those arrangements, those 'sound effects,' to use a somewhat accurate term nonperjoratively....i mean, i just think that speaks to a deaf spot on your part more than anything else. if you've even heard much of it to begin with. not liking it is not liking it, but as a formal achievement, at the very least, i think it should be more difficult to deny than that.