Unfortunately, I don't know if I have good enough perspective to give a full report. I'll just list a bunch of stuff and hopefully there will be some useful information in there for you.VaticanShotglass wrote: Fri Oct 03, 2025 8:51 am
The other one, the three pickup model, I play more often, but the original pickups just seem to be holding it back. While it has three pickups I usually have the middle one bypassed. It's got unpotted ~8k "vintage style" humbuckers. The bridge position actually sounds pretty good, but the neck pickup is woofy and dull. Plus it over powers the bridge when I try to combine them. So I'm thinking of either the Big Birds or maybe a more open/ballanced PAF. I was leaning towards the former, but worry they might be a bit thinner than I'm used to or maybe too bright or harsh.
What do you think? It's hard to find good demos of pickups where people play big chords or less classic rock stuff. And what sort of problems did the unpotted versions give you? I'm used to unpotted pickups in my old guitars, this Les Paul in particular, but I don't play at high volume very much. They stay really quiet but you can hear if you tap them or whatever.
I was never a "humbucker guy" until a few years ago. It always seemed like there was a compressor that I couldn't turn off on the guitar. I got my first Revstar because it played great and I needed a two humbucker guitar for work testing. Over the years I found myself gravitating to that guitar.
The stock pickups in both of my Revstars (full size HB and P90) always seemed a bit on the dark side. I don't know if it was pickup voicing, or guitar influence. I heard from a lot of Revstar users that they though the guitars leaned towards being on the dark side. I went on a pickup journey with the HB model. I ended up with a Gibson 498t/490r set. They seem a bit brighter than the average HB pickup, and are on the louder side. This seems to balance out the guitar.
My second Revstar is the P90 one in the photo above. It has a separate bridge and tailpiece, plus it has chambering in the body. Acoustically, i's a much brighter and resonant instrument. Still, the stock sound was a bit muffled. I got the Mr. Fab Neil Young pickup set from kinda forum, ex-Chicago dude Matt Diehl. The guitar came to life. The neck p90 was more like I'd expect; more articulation, like a full single coil. The bridge FB pickup just ripped. It was brighter and louder than the P90, but the brightness was in the upper mids rather than distinct treble.
The unpotted pickup, mixed with higher gain rock (cranked JCM800 style) would pick up too much string noise and would often do that squealy, higher frequency feedback that microphonic pickups are known for. If I was playing at more of a mid gain rock or lower setting, I can see how microphonic pickups could add interesting tonal color. It's like having a little bit of a microphone signal picking up the snappiness of the strings. Non-microphonic pickups trade this and give a more fundamental-oriented tone, and get rid of all the squeals and acoustical handling noise. FM Steve had microphonic pickups in his main guitar, which is why he could yell into them when the fuzz was on and be heard through the amp. Perhaps it's another factor towards his specific and articulated sound.
TLDR: FB pickups are, in general, more shifted to the treble than full size, traditional humbuckers. However, they're not at trebly and have much more of a solid bottom than traditional single coils. If anything, they feel like the pissed off older brother of filtertrons. Also, here's a cool video where Joe Gore compairs mini hums to FB pickups.