More often than not, I find myself saying this about his music. And, like Andy Warhol was to art, Bowie's influence has been somewhat negative (elevating style and starfucking over substance and sweat), even though I like a fair amount of work directly done by both of them. But like Warhol, Bowie opened the door for a lot of crass and fluffy charlatans in his wake.Gramsci wrote: Fri Jan 09, 2026 9:31 am All this said I can see why someone wouldn’t enjoy Bowie. There is an element of “surface over depth” that comes with the ever evolving sound, trend chasing rather than setting etc.
Furthermore, so many of Bowie's best moments have more to do w/Ronson, Eno, and/or Fripp than they do w/Bowie. (I hope I can be fair and also blame Rodgers and Reznor for some lousier ones?)
On the other hand, Bowie had a knack for bringing interesting collaborators together and well, something of a vision (even if that vision was often driven by trends or pioneered by other musicians). He was also cool enough to give a shit about Glenn Branca in the '80s. (Even though that supposedly influenced um, Tin Machine. Eek.)
Hero, yes, agreed. But a waffly one.