Re: What are you thinking right this second?

2381
jfv wrote: Thu Feb 19, 2026 5:47 pm It’s fucked up how I feel about DD

Older sisters engrained this shit into me before I was ten years old.

My grandpa hated DD. One day the MUZAK channel played “The Reflex” and he lost his shit. It was spectacular.

I only knew “the hits” back in the day, and listening back to their s/t album, it’s all basic shit in the key of E. But damn, I like the album cuts better than the singles.

In my stupid suburban cover band, I’ve been trying to get the others to play songs like “Friends of Mine”. They don’t wanna.

I fully acknowledge I have a problem.
They're in the key of E, but they're also played by real people, who wanted to be in a band, and made decisions. John Taylor is no slouch of a bassist.

One day the MUZAK channel played “The Reflex” and he lost his shit. It was spectacular.
This takes on an extra dimension that the label didn't want to release the single version because it was "too black". They also thought people wouldn't like it.

whu-whu-whu-what a great way to prove them wrong
"I got to tell you, if I went to a show and an opening band I never heard of lugged a Super Six on stage, I am paying attention." - Owen

Re: What are you thinking right this second?

2386
Not having an active Twitter or Instagram account, or whathaveyou, I haven't followed all of the hullabaloo surrounding Wim Wenders's statement at this year's Berlinale, that artists "have to stay out of politics."

Feels like a lot of contention could have been avoided if he'd simply said, "Artists have the right to stay out of politics." In other words, not all art needs to be overtly or even subtly "political." That would be harder to argue against for people that aren't within spitting distance of being psychotic and terminally online.

It's been my belief for 25+ years. Seems reasonable.

And it's worth noting that, whatever you might think of his more recent output, or his filmography as a whole, pound for pound Wenders has made better films than most directors working today, including, it's worth noting, several of those who've signed that statement against him. To be honest, a lot of active artists would be better off attaching themselves less to whatever hot button issues or theories or moral quandaries or contentious divides are at play today. If nothing else, it would date their work less.

No one wants to be outmoded or seen as a bootlicker for the corrupt ruling elite; few people who are heavily invested in the social world want to be seen as standing on the sidelines while the world falls apart, especially when people are dying. But too many people of various disciplines feel the need to take a stand on all sorts of things, as if the success or failure of a given effort hinges upon their specific input. This isn't completely outside the bounds of art making, in some cases, but often enough it is. And not everyone is able to do this without being awkward in their quest for relevance, their desire to be on top of things, to be a bad ass. In other words, "political art" suits some creators, but not others. Both should be allowed to exist. I would hate to live in a world in which the things people make are either always "political," as if by decree, or never "political," for fear of ruffling feathers and confronting hard truths.

[/rant]
ZzzZzzZzzz . . .

New Novel.

Re: What are you thinking right this second?

2387
I was a really good boy in the last 25 days. I cut off beer all together, started eating good and lost 10kgs. Metric. Feel great, Started thinking with my brain again.

But I will give it a try today again, I will drink some and write music a bit in the evening until I pass out.

This will end badly. I still hate my drummer.
Nothing major here. Just a regular EU cock. I pull it out and there is beans all over my penis. Bean shells all over my penis...

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests