This is an underrated post
Re: THUNDERDOME: ecological impact of children vs. mining crypto
101Wherefore did gonzochicago not respond to this thread?
This is an underrated post
We usually aren’t so judgmental around here.ChudFusk wrote: Sun Mar 08, 2026 4:46 pm Wherefore did gonzochicago not respond to this thread?
This is an underrated post
clocker bob may 30, 2006 wrote:I think the possibility of interbreeding between an earthly species and an extraterrestrial species is as believable as any other explanation for the existence of George W. Bush.
Looksmaxing? What's that?Gramsci wrote: Mon Mar 09, 2026 8:08 am One is a weird fad that will pass. The other is the entire reason for human existence.
I think people that post on socials about how they’re choosing not to have children to “save the planet” are the worst example of pointless signaling this side of looksmaxing.
Look up "Clavicular."ogpuprison wrote: Mon Mar 09, 2026 6:02 pmLooksmaxing? What's that?Gramsci wrote: Mon Mar 09, 2026 8:08 am One is a weird fad that will pass. The other is the entire reason for human existence.
I think people that post on socials about how they’re choosing not to have children to “save the planet” are the worst example of pointless signaling this side of looksmaxing.
I got a random text from a friend that read "Are you ready to be brutally framemogged while jestering with looksmaxxer Clavicular?" the other day. I have zero idea wtf he is talking about but the combination of words makes me queasy. I'm not looking that up.enframed wrote: Thu Mar 12, 2026 1:26 pmLook up "Clavicular."ogpuprison wrote: Mon Mar 09, 2026 6:02 pmLooksmaxing? What's that?Gramsci wrote: Mon Mar 09, 2026 8:08 am One is a weird fad that will pass. The other is the entire reason for human existence.
I think people that post on socials about how they’re choosing not to have children to “save the planet” are the worst example of pointless signaling this side of looksmaxing.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests