#5 Louisville 44, #3 West Virginia 34

21
Brett Eugene Ralph wrote:
syntaxfree07 wrote:
Brett Eugene Ralph wrote:
syntaxfree07 wrote:The organization may be cowardly. That has nothing to do with the team, bro. I'll respond to your point when you make one. The game may not happen. I'm just saying if it did. I don't care who throws the first punch or sets up the fight-- Vandy would win it hands-down.


Please don't call me "bro."


Sorry, dude. Just colloqialism. You're really starting to ham me out, man.

For some reason we speak like Californians in East Tennessee.


If you're in east Tennessee, why aren't you crowing about the Vols? They'd give the Cards a much better game.


Because everyone knows the Vols would trash Louisville. I'm a fan. Our season is over, though. Two losses is decent UT season. All I can hope for now is BCS game. Even though we should be playing a Bowl game. I love that Crompton kid. Hate Fulmer.

#5 Louisville 44, #3 West Virginia 34

23
Brett Eugene Ralph wrote:By the way, did you all see ESPN outing the SEC as having, with the excpetion of Georgia, refused to play Louisville? Like he said, if Auburn and Florida and Tennessee wanna claim Louisville has a weak schedule and that they (and their conference) is so much better, they should put their jocks where their mouth is and play the Cards.


Tennessee wasn't afraid to play Cal (Who they crushed). It's not like the Vols have anything to prove.

Florida still has a National Title shot with one loss. Louisville doesn't.

I wouldn't want to play Louisville with that schedule. Just hype, though.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest