tocharian wrote:
A lot of rock's charm is that it's kitsch that doesn't know it's kitsch. It's in earnest.
This is an amazing, baffling quote. I never saw this. Wow.
I'm thinking specifically of the birth of rock and roll (someone wants to argue this point with me, start up another thread and we'll roll). Elvis going into Sun Studios for the first time. He starts singing a couple common ballads from the time. Lackluster. Sam Phillips shakes his head but keeps trying. They take a break. Elvis picks up the guitar and
starts goofing around on "That's All Right, Mama". He thinks it's a joke. The band laughs and follow along. Phillips stops everything and jumps into that sound with both feet. Everything else follows from that.
From the start rock wasn't taken seriously by the performers. But it does demand seriousness. There is something awesome and primal about it. As I said, it's the opposite of kitsch, which is done in earnest, dead seriously, but cannot be taken seriously. Certainly, Elvis was taken so seriously he got to stop driving a truck for a living.
All my favourite bands have done what Elvis did - in essence, "let's screw things up and see what happens". Something happens that is greater than just notes on a page or a piece of music.
Satie's early pieces certainly have the same mocking motivations behind them but are of the utmost gravity and awesomeness.
I could go on and on. But anyway. You're wrong.