Last Question(s) for Steve
Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 3:42 pm
Skronk wrote:I'll be roadie/tech/merchandise guy if you promise to cover "Moonchild".
Done and done. I'll throw in "Chord Of Souls" just cuz it's awesome.
Skronk wrote:I'll be roadie/tech/merchandise guy if you promise to cover "Moonchild".
Rick Reuben wrote:You don't get it. Where does the definition of 'common decency' come from? It comes from those who have appointed themselves to define it. Instant ideology. From there, how is it enforced? By ideologues.jimmy spako wrote:Rick Reuben wrote:There are always ulterior motives promoting any ideology.
you see ideology where others see simply common decency & mutual respect, because, clever as you can often be, the latter two concepts still seem to be utterly foreign to you.
Rick Reuben wrote:You don't get it. Where does the definition of 'asshole' come from? It comes from those who have appointed themselves to define it.sunlore wrote:If not being asshole is an ideology then fucking brushing your teeth is. You are doing a disservice to discours. Oh wait.
Marsupialized wrote:'This piece of shit watch never works right'
Marsupialized wrote:'This piece of shit pizza is fucking disgusting'
Marsupialized wrote:'This piece of shit car keeps breaking down'
Rick Reuben wrote:If you are trying to use peer pressure to control what is allowable speech, then you are acting to restrict speech. Obviously, if your interest wasn't in controlling speech, you wouldn't be making posts telling us why it needed to be controlled! If you were only interested in making that decision on what to listen to for yourself, then you wouldn't post your opinion on a public forum- you would just tune it out. You are not reacting to free speech. You are acting against free speech, by taking an advocacy position on a public forum.
Rick Reuben wrote:But what you're describing is the total opposite of the situation that prompted this thread. Mandroid was not walking down the street, casually insulting Mexicans she had never met before. She insulted a Mexican she had been dealing with for a week. I see no reason to believe that she was not simply insulting the individual, and not his entire ethnicity.sunlore wrote:it comes from a sense of not going out of your way to offend others casually.
Josef K wrote:
Do you know Mandroid?
Rick Reuben wrote:Are you unable to read the post that Horuss used to start the thread?? In what way was Mandroid 'going out of her way to casually offend Mexicans'? She insulted one Mexican, who had been in her yard for a week.Josef K wrote:Rick Reuben wrote:But what you're describing is the total opposite of the situation that prompted this thread. Mandroid was not walking down the street, casually insulting Mexicans she had never met before. She insulted a Mexican she had been dealing with for a week. I see no reason to believe that she was not simply insulting the individual, and not his entire ethnicity.sunlore wrote:it comes from a sense of not going out of your way to offend others casually.Josef K wrote:
Do you know Mandroid?
Rick Reuben wrote:I'll give you a chance to clarify your position: Do you believe that a person who does not vocally condemn what Mandroid said, in the situation that she said it in, is therefore sympathetic to racism? Or, do you think it is possible that a person would not condemn Mandroid because that person values free speech more than he feels a responsibility to tell others how they should talk?