10
by burun_Archive
I think his paintings, as paintings, are quite interesting to look at. His drawings are much more interesting than the paintings.
Not Crap.
However, I think after his death art critics/scholars dug for meaning and subtext in his work that I think just isn't there. I honestly don't think in 90% of his work that Basquiat is "upholding the griot tradition" or "expressing the pain of his Haitian roots" like the people who write walltexts would have you believe. So those guys are Crap.
Earlier this year I took part in an art outreach program in Newark, New Jersey. Five high school art classes (a different one each day, for four weeks) from the worst schools in the Tri-State area (and perhaps the US) were taken to a variety of museums and galleries to show these kids (mostly poor and black) that art was
- not always "pretty"
- not made exclusively by white men
- not always made by people with training
- not always high-concept
All the classes were taken to the Basquiat show, which at that point was at the Brooklyn Museum. All of the kids had a strong reaction to it, which to me meant that Basquiat's art wasn't all crap. Not all of them liked it, but they all reacted to it. Which, in the end, is what I was taught art was supposed to do. These kids couldn't care less about subtext.
I think what captured their attention the most was the fact that he had started as a tagger.
Fun Facts: Basquiat is in Blondie's "Rapture" video, playing turntables. Not Crap.
Basquiat was in a band with Vincent Gallo, called Grey. The band: Not Crap. Allowing one's self to stand in such close proximity to Vincent Gallo: Crap.
Basquiat was called, often to his face, "Jean-Michel Basketcase" by my pal Jim.
I make
music/I also
make pretty
pictures