You're not obligated to actually like either of these, simply pick the lesser of two evils.
Jill Sobule circa 1997 (I think).
Katy Perry this year.

Well, I don't have to turn off Jill 0:30 seconds in because the auto-tune is so apparent.











But because it's so bad.




No vote.

The Katy Perry chick is much hotter, but her song is not even a real song.
The Jill Globule or whatever, at least she sat down and wrote a song, I guess.
It's a horrible stupid song, but it's a song.

The first time I saw a picture of Katy Perry (next to the name of her debut album "One of The Boys"), I thought she was supposed to be a transvestite. A convincing one, but transvestite nevertheless. I guess that goes to show my skills in reading comprehension...

Regardless, Jill Sobule's song is the obvious winner. Not the best song, but still charming and coy. Katy Perry's song is bad enough to offend both real lesbians and lipstick lesbians.

Also, she used to be a Christian pop artist before going into mainstream pop. Yeah, fuck that.

kazoozak wrote:Not the best song...

Just looking for the lesser of two evils.

Katy Perry wrote:The taste of her cherry Chapstick

That's a pretty good line. Pretty, pretty good.

She's a former gospel singer who discovered Queen records and now writes sexually ambiguous songs? Did I hear that right?

If she covers "Driving Through Leeds" I will decide she is not crap.

Fuck You, Charlie D. Fuck you. Fuck.

Lonesome Bulldog wrote:Fuck You, Charlie D. Fuck you. Fuck.

You didn't think I actually posted porn, did you?

horrible coy nonsense. start yodeling about tribadism.

I have to go with the current. Katy Perry. I just like the way she looks, and so does any other guy that likes her music I would bet. Otherwise it's just a pile of overproduced musicmashing done by a guy in front of a computer