greg wrote:wiggins wrote:3. the mics were about 1' away, is that too close?
Away from the instrument, or each other?
The instrument.
Moderator: Greg
greg wrote:wiggins wrote:3. the mics were about 1' away, is that too close?
Away from the instrument, or each other?
wiggins wrote:greg wrote:wiggins wrote:3. the mics were about 1' away, is that too close?
Away from the instrument, or each other?
The instrument.
Michael Gregory Bridavsky wrote:you can get very interesting and impressive results (on the right source) by close-miking with an M-S pair. You will have to boost your side mic significantly though.
Ive used M_S pairs 9-12" from speakers before. It can sound very cool and subtle in a sparse arrangement.
blessings,
mtar
NLMD311 wrote:Michael Gregory Bridavsky wrote:you can get very interesting and impressive results (on the right source) by close-miking with an M-S pair. You will have to boost your side mic significantly though.
Ive used M_S pairs 9-12" from speakers before. It can sound very cool and subtle in a sparse arrangement.
blessings,
mtar
But a boost of the sides is needed (otherwise your Mid is just dominating the image, right?).
What kind of mics have you used for this, mtar?
-Darrill
bigmuffya wrote:i have a lot of confusion.
how do i split the 2 sides of the figure 8 mic in an m/s? do i just take the mics channel and duplicate it then pan them hard left and hard right? or does each lobe of the fig 8 get its own seperate chanel...if so, how do i split them? a seperate outbox or something? and once theyre split how would i change the phase on one side?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest