Wood Goblin wrote: Wed Jan 29, 2025 7:55 am My oldest child, who is trans, was in a panic about these latest executive orders. It looks like it won’t affect her, but that’s cold comfort for the countless kids who will be affected. I will look into donating to whoever can secure HRT for these kids today.

I'll donate also. If anyone here can point me in the right direction...

Can I talk about trans genocide now?

These kids won’t have kids if we fund that.

Curry Pervert wrote: Wed Jan 29, 2025 12:13 am

hbiden@onlyfans.com wrote: Tue Jan 28, 2025 10:29 pm

prof Ned Foley wrote:If a Condorcet-consistent electoral system had been in place that enabled a third candidate in between these two to demonstrate majority support against each head-to-head, that third candidate—presumably, a rule-of-law Republican like Nikki Haley (or possibly Larry Hogan)—would have won the election instead of Trump.

Moot. The system is all sewn up to have only 2 candidates.

but they’re selected from a pool of nominees and it matters how we count them.
Lots of jurisdictions are going to put rcv on the ballot like Alaska & Australia. It’s important to get it right in the beginning.

hbiden@onlyfans.com wrote: Wed Jan 29, 2025 11:06 am Can I talk about trans genocide now?

These kids won’t have kids if we fund that.

?

Puberty blockers and HRT are big business now. Europe is not having it. These kids’ future is at stake.

My personal experience is that over the last five or six years GAC has been severely gate-kept. Doctors will flat out be proactively uncooperative, more so over the last two years, imo. I had an experience with a Christian doctor, fresh out of school, where it felt like she was in the field like Jane Goodall. I followed her career as long as I could stand it - wouldn't you know, she moved onto research. Someone can be 'passed around' for years, from doctor to doctor, every single one of them gate-keeping. I don't know what my point is. I guess it's just an observation.

I guess my point is that GAC isn't a "growth industry".

Maybe, maybe not.
It can’t hurt to pump the brakes a little.

hbiden@onlyfans.com wrote: Wed Jan 29, 2025 11:50 am Puberty blockers and HRT are big business now. Europe is not having it. These kids’ future is at stake.

Sean, you have essentially trolled this place for a couple years, giving the impression that you might have ultimately supported Trump and now you are actively harassing a parent of a trans-kid in a thread about the brutal moves being made by the Trump regime. If you can't refrain from posting such insensitive shit (which is not theoretical or mere opinion any more, but active cheerleading of an – at best – severely regressive/repressive regime) then I would suggest your account be nuked. Have the decency to just shut the fuck up if you can't muster any empathy.

hbiden@onlyfans.com wrote: Wed Jan 29, 2025 11:50 am These kids’ future is at stake.

You are correct on this part, but not in the way you are implying.

My youngest kid (now 16) assumed at a young age that they were supposed to grow up to be a woman and marry a man. Around their tween years, they were extremely moody, depressed, and questioning whether they wanted to live because they were having feelings that were very different than this. They opened up to us and we responded with support and love. They have been much happier and positive since then because they are comfortable with and are able to be themselves.

NOT giving gender-affirming care is putting these kids' lives at risk.

hbiden@onlyfans.com wrote: Wed Jan 29, 2025 11:06 am Can I talk about trans genocide now?

Nobody said yes to this, by the way.