48
by Teacher's Pet
I don't get the "poly bag everything" mindset.
Touching, feeling, smelling the old records is one of my favorite parts of the whole thing.
It's like choosing to use condoms for no reason.
If I was collecting $$$$ old records that deserved historical preservation, sure, I guess.
But almost none of my records are precious enough for that.
Some of them are falling apart badly and those usually go into a bag.
I hate the way a shelf full of bag-ends looks. And you can't even read the spines!
I never alphabetize anything, that's crazy.
Hear me out: I keep my Jamaican records in one place, I don't want to hunt in 40 different places when its time to have an impromptu dance party.
Marvin, Stevie, Curtis, Isleys, Withers, Kool, they all share a region.
Motown has its section and so does Memphis/Stax.
Africa has a section, so does Asia and Germany. And Blues/Folk.
60s synth weirdos are right near Germany which is all 70s weirdos.
US & UK underground/indie have their own regions and are grouped into families, like for example the Shellacs are near Palace and Drag City, Louisville, etc.
Jazz piano players are together. BeatlesStonesWho. DylanTheBandNeil.
There's drawbacks, I admit -- I have a few beloved records that just belong nowhere, which is really its own special distinction (Looking at you, Arthur Russell.)
I keep a stash of basic white paper inner sleeves that I use to replace only missing or truly decrepit inner sleeves.
Usually when an old record comes with an old generic "label catalog" printed on the paper inner sleeve, I try to keep them together, as they have traveled through the galaxy together for decades like R2 and C3PO and they should never be split up if you can avoid it.
How anal? Hardly at all, I guess. Just play the fuckin' things and don't worry so much.